Herculina / Science

Science · Herculina

What the research says about Herculina

These are two research papers, all free to read on arXiv, about Herculina, including one family-level paper labeled as such. We summarize each one in plain English from its abstract.

  • Papers 2
  • Topics 2
  • Reviewed Oct 24, 2026
  • Source arXiv.org
Illustrative · not to scale

Our own artist's impression. No figures are taken from the papers.

01

Size, shape & spin

1 paper

How big Herculina is, what shape it has and how it spins.

[1]2016astro-ph.EPPreprint

Results of testing for presence of satellites near 18 Melpomene and 532 Herculina by the speckle-interferometry method

I. A. Sokova, E. N. Sokov, V. V. Dyachenko & 2 others

What they foundA search found no satellites near Herculina, despite a 1978 occultation that hinted at one.

Why it mattersIt tests an old claim of a moon around Herculina.
What they studied

Speckle interferometry with the 6-m BTA telescope.

02

Orbit & dynamics

1 paper

How Herculina moves, and the gravity and sunlight forces that shape its path.

[2]2011astro-ph.EPPreprintFamily-level

Chaotic diffusion of the Vesta family induced by close encounters with massive asteroids

J. -B. Delisle & J. Laskar

What they foundHerculina is one of 11 massive asteroids whose close encounters stir up the orbits of Vesta-family asteroids, though Ceres and Vesta dominate.

Why it mattersIt shows Herculina is massive enough to matter for its neighbours' orbits.

Family-level context: this paper studies massive asteroids that perturb the Vesta family, a list that includes Herculina, not Herculina specifically.

What they studied

Numerical estimates of orbital diffusion from close encounters.

New research

New papers on Herculina, checked weekly, summarized after a person reads it.

RSS feed

No new papers on Herculina this week. We check arXiv every week.

How we choose papers

We search arXiv for Herculina papers and keep the ones that add something new, are clearly written up and are relevant to a general reader. A person reads every abstract.

Our own words, our own drawings

Summaries are written by us from each paper’s abstract, not copied. Diagrams are our own simplified drawings, not figures from the papers.

Preprint vs. peer-reviewed

“Peer-reviewed” means arXiv lists a journal reference for the paper. Everything else is marked “Preprint”: shared openly, possibly before or without journal review.

Paper metadata courtesy of arXiv. Summaries written by us; read the original papers via the links. Paper metadata from arXiv.org, which does not endorse this site.